BergkampFlick's blog

A blog following in Dennis' footsteps. Ajax, Arsenal and Dutch football

Barcelona are through to the semi-finals, after beating Paris Saint-Germain by three goals to… three?


The cup of Champions

The cup of Champions

The tension of the Champions League knockout stages. Two teams, usually from a different league, square off to determine who is the superior side. The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra starts playing that beautiful anthem, millions at home or at the pub clutch their beers and prepare for a glorious encounter at the summit of European club football. After two hard-fought battles, the team that managed to ripple their adversary’s net more often than the other way around, wins. But is that what happens? Do clubs go on a relentless, all-out mission to outscore their opponents? They do not, for there is a rule that prevents them to do so.

The away goals rule seems incredibly flawed. The term ‘knockout stage’ implies that the teams play each other at their respective grounds until one team outscores the other.
Of course, one could argue that the rule encourages teams to be more attacking away from home, especially in the first leg. This, however, is not reality; home teams are usually very cautious and their foes try to snatch a goal on the counter-attack most of the time. This regularly results in very nervous and less exciting encounters.

Twice in this season’s edition of the Champions League we’ve seen teams getting knocked out due to failing to score more goals away from home. Last night’s encounter is still fresh in the memory. Barcelona bested Paris Saint-Germain by 3-3 on aggregate, coincidentally the same score line that saw fellow Fly Emirates-sponsored Arsenal’s cup-winning dreams shattered at the hands of German Rekordmeister Bayern München. Slightly irrelevant, but you could argue that extra time would’ve resulted in a different winner on both occasions if it wasn’t for the away goals rule. It’s time to look at, possibly outdated and unrealistic, alternatives.

Pedro scores the 'winner' for Barcelona

Pedro scores the ‘winner’ for Barcelona


Extra time and penalties
We are all familiar with this system; two halves of fifteen minutes after a 90-minute match. If both teams fail to outscore their opponent, the match goes to the lottery of penalties. Within this system there are multiple options:
1. Your normal, equal extra time: 1 goal is 1 goal, regardless of who plays home and away.
Pros: The team that scores the most goals, or eventually penalties, wins; a proper winner.
Cons: The home team, arguably, still has the advantage of playing in front of its own fans.
2. Away goals scored in extra time count double in case of a draw.
Pros: The away team is more enticed to attack to grab a winner, thus avoiding penalties.
Cons: The home team is at a disadvantage and will be inclined to defend to avoid conceding.

A replay
Another possibility could be a new match at a neutral ground. Quite unrealistic, but fair nonetheless.
No obvious advantage, purely looking at this one game, for either team. A level playing field.
However, it’s near impossible to fit in another exhausting Champions League encounter. It would need adjustment to not only the Champions League schedule, but also the schedules of the clubs’ respective leagues. Not to mention the fact that fans thought they had paid for a decisive encounter previously, only to see the match go to a replay.

Golden or Silver Goal
This is obviously a long shot, for the Golden and Silver Goal rules only existed between 1993 and 2004. The Golden Goal rule states that, if a match goes to extra time, the first team to score a goal is immediately declared the winner. Most people find this unfair, and it’s easy to understand why; the conceding team can’t redeem itself. The Silver Goal, however, could be a good option if you adjust it a bit. The original Silver Goal rule is that, if a team scores in extra time, the opposing team has until the end of that 15-minute half to manage a draw (and go to penalties), or a win even.
It might be worth considering introducing the Bronze Goal rule© as an adjustment to the Silver Goal Rule. This rule, made up by your writer, states that, at the start of extra time, a team is allowed to make 3 additional substitutes. If a team scores in extra time, the opposing team has 15 minutes to equalise or even grab a winner. If the score line is balanced after the regular 30 minutes or after the 15 minutes since the first goal in extra time was scored, the match goes to penalties.
This may sound a bit naïve, but it would be very entertaining.

In conclusion: It’s hard to come up with a completely fair alternative to the already unfair away goals rule. What started out as an attempt to find a proper way to end a football match, ended up being a mere summary of more or less unrealistic options. The point, however, stands: The existing rule ends a thrilling contest in a thoroughly unsatisfactory fashion. Whether or not your team is on the receiving end of it, we all want to see a real winner in the gladiators’ arena of Champions.

Don’t forget to share if you like my scribbling. I also like comments, whether it’s on here on or Twitter.

Advertenties

2 reacties op “Barcelona are through to the semi-finals, after beating Paris Saint-Germain by three goals to… three?

  1. Soccerisma
    11 april 2013

    Away goals rule seems fair when you look at the “home-advantage” factor. Teams get thrashed away and then bounce back at home to win the tie. That is why 1 goal is not 1 goal because home advantage matters alot

    Another neutral game, obviously unrealistic, a better option can be the way they do in internationals, only a single game in neutral venue. Then again it takes the “fun” and the atmostphere of home/away grounds.

    It does hurt when your team is eliminated because of that away goal rule but it seems fair to me and an exciting aspect of the knockout rounds

    • bergkampflick
      11 april 2013

      What does getting thrashed away have to do with the away goals rule? Over two legs, both teams have the home advantage. If they manage to score the same amount of goals over two matches, they should play extra time or any other option to determine who wins.
      In my opinion one goal is not more valuable than the other, therefore the away goals rule is unfair. If you do not agree, you should read this article by Jonathan Wilson that has been brought to my attention today:
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2013/mar/13/the-question-football-away-goals

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s

Informatie

Dit bericht was geplaatst op 11 april 2013 door in English, Football en getagd als , , , .
By fans for fans Arsenal News
Arsenal News & Transfers

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Doe mee met 5 andere volgers